Finishing Race

   Hello readers, and welcome back! I have finished reading the fourth and final part of Race this week, and I'd like to share my thoughts on this last part. If you've read my previous three posts, I mention many of Aronson's strengths as a writer and many of the strengths of this particular book. I've enjoyed his attitude and writing style from the beginning because it encouraged me to think for myself about the ideas he presented, rather than trying to convince me to agree with him. I found that this made me more interested in what he had to say, and made him seem qualified to write about a topic such as race. This book has been quite pleasant in terms of organization as well; the ideas are presented in chronological order, and each new one builds off of the previous, which is especially helpful in understanding the historical connections he writes about. That being said, I'm sad to say I was quite disappointed with the end of this book. Given the strength of Aronson's arguments, his writing style, and the comprehensive organization, I was expecting a much stronger finish than what I read.


   Aronson begins by describing social differences across ancient civilizations, like the Greeks and the Sumerians, which primarily revolved around the idea of "civilized" vs. "savage". He then moves on to Rome, whose social divisions go a step further to distinguish people based on their status within the community. The birth of Christianity detailed shortly after illustrates a community wherein the only differences that matters are those "between God and humanity" (Aronson, 206). The frailty of this ideal is portrayed by the section dedicated to the Crusades. Aronson then carries the story through the Middle Ages, where new prejudices are born through ancient teachings and beliefs. Finally, we see the progression of race through early American History, as emphasized by the Enlightenment. Throughout the first three-quarters of this book, these ideas have been substantiated and their connections revealed fascinatingly. The plot as a whole has been cohesive and logical, the main ideas strong and clear. The last quarter of the book picks up in the early 1900s, where I'm sad to say Aronson had me a little confused and frustrated.


   The last few chapters start with the road to the Holocaust, which details Hitler's rise to power and the spread of extreme new racial theories. As Aronson put it, "race seemed to divide people more than ever before" (207), and Hitler took advantage of this to gain the influence that he did. I thought this was a fairly reasonable topic to approach next, but where he started to lose me was when he included a monologue of sorts (pg. 208), a reflection regarding the Holocaust. I was really surprised at how intensely opinionated, almost emotional it was. Of course, his opinion is one that many likely share, but it felt unwarranted in the context of the rest of the book. After detailing the horrors of the Holocaust, he switches gears quite rapidly to compare the fate of the Japanese Americans in the U.S. to the Holocaust victims, which did seem like a reasonable connection to make, but then he switches again to talk about Gandhi and the struggles of Indians in England. While Aronson does draw some parallels between the oppression of the latter and former groups, the connections are much looser and less thoroughly elaborated than I would have liked, and he jumps from one topic to the other quite suddenly.

   From England, Aronson jumps to the Bill of Rights and lynchings from the previous part of the book, and then to the Judgement at Nuremberg and back to Gandhi again. I did appreciate the connections between African Americans and the non-violent protesting that originated in India. Aronson did do a good job showing the influence that Gandhi and others had on the Civil Rights Movement. Summarizing the entirety of the last part of this book would be quite lengthy, so I've only provided a few specific examples of the slightly chaotic disorganization. You can rest assured that the pattern continues through to the end of the book, though. 


   For the most part, the ideas were still relevant and important parts of the story Aronson told; it was mostly the writing and organization, or lack thereof, that let me down. The very last chapter, "Black is A Way of Acting": Race Today, honestly just felt unfinished and like it didn't serve a purpose. Again, the ideas seemed scattered and loosely connected to me, and I feel like he tried to shift the focus at the last minute to discuss our present ideas of race, which I think is deserving of a separate book itself and not a measly final chapter. He does finish with a classic inspiring bit about everyone being a member of one race, the human race, but even that felt a little tacky. Others who are finishing up Race as well, feel free to let me know what you thought about these final chapters; I'm very interested to see if anyone had the same thoughts as I did. Thanks for reading!

Comments

  1. Hi Naomi!
    It's the worst when a great book has a subpar ending! By what you were describing, the book seems extremely well organized and methodical in its presentation of race, until it reached more recent events. Do you think Aronson had a hard time not being opinionated on topics such as the Holocaust because they were so recent, and still raw? Other events such as the Crusades we are much more removed from, so I feel as though we simply accept these events as fact rather than forming an opinion. The same cannot be said for the Holocaust. However, you also mentioned how "jumpy" he got towards the end. Do you think this is because race in the present-day is no longer linear? I feel as though it is hard to specifically pinpoint a progression of race nowadays. Especially with race being so politically loaded, sadly, I feel as though the topic has gotten far more complicated. Would you agree? This was a great blog post to read and I may just have to pick up "Race" for myself!
    - Emma H.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Emma,
      Thank you for your comment! You raised really interesting points, and I think you're spot on. It makes a lot of sense that ideas about recent events would be less clearly organized because they're smaller parts of a bigger picture that we can't fully see yet. We've had less time to reflect on and learn from these racial conflicts than the ones that occurred hundreds of years ago, and I hadn't considered that as I made my judgments on the last few chapters. You also mentioned that race is "no longer linear", and I've never heard it said that way before, but it makes perfect sense! Aronson has linearly presented the history of race: chronologically, one event after the other, one time period after the other. It painted a cohesive picture, but I would have to agree that recent events are too scattered and complex to be written about in the same way, which brings a new light to my understanding and appreciation of "Race". Thank you for reading and offering your ideas and perspective, and I hope you do get a chance to read this book!

      Delete
  2. Do you think that the recency of the events in the last part of the book made it harder for him to write more objectively about, since it is still pretty close to us, and because those ideas can still be controversial?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Naomi, I wonder if perhaps the disorganization was done on purpose? At the beginning of the book, Aronson invited his readers to think about the topic of race with him. I wonder if this is his way of showing that his ideas on the subject are still being formed and not as comprehensive as in the past? One reason I thought that he might not have focused so much on the present is that it is hard to talk about things we feel are current. Do you think that the disorganization could have been to show that our modern idea of race feels unfinished and lacking like the last section of the book? Similarly, could this be Aronson's invitation to continue to pursue knowledge on the subject by not giving you all you wanted?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Tessa,
      I appreciate your comment! Since making my last post, I have considered how the nature of current events would make it difficult for Aronson to maintain the same level of organization and clarity in the end as he did in the rest of the book. I'm not sure how I overlooked this while I was reading and instead immediately concluded that he had finished in a hurry. I agree that the "unfinished feel" reflects that we're still living through a time of racial tension (and hopefully reformation). On a related note, I like your idea that the incomplete feel of the finishing chapters is also an invitation of sorts, and whether or not it was intended to be, I do feel inspired by this book to educate myself more about race to the best of my ability. Learning about the extensive and complex history of race makes me wonder that much more about the fate of race in today's society.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts